Skip to main content

Continuous Delivery as an accelerator for the product-market fit

Product development (and by consequence any software-centered development) is a tricky process, in which you always need to make sure that you’re not only adding complexity but you also can control it. 




When it comes to complexity controlling, we should focus primarily on 3 pillars:
  • Scope of change
  • Change cost
  • Escape options

Scope of change

When we think about a new feature, or a new data stream that will be added to the product scope, we should take the time to think about the scope of change. Which parts of the product will be affected by that change? It doesn’t hurt to think a little bit on the negative side: What could be broke down by such a change? How this new complexity is going to be integrated?

Thinking about such aspects might give you at least high-level perspective on the affected areas, and thus you can pay more attention to those areas to make sure the complexity is still maintained and under control.

Change Cost

Think about that like you’re going to be wrong, even if you have validated outcomes, you may have to change that in the future, to what degree you can adopt this change? Does it break other product aspects if you integrated the new feature and then changed the way it behaves? Are you creating a new dependency that will cost you more if you wanted to change?

Have these questions in mind while thinking about it from that aspect. It can give you wider perspective.

Escape Options

When you add new complexity to your product, do you have the option to rollback anytime? What would that look like for your product? Will you be experiencing a down time? How much time would that take?

What if we figured out that this new feature isn’t a good fit for the product, maybe we acquired a new market that changed our product perspective, are we ready to rollout this feature? Are we flexible enough to plug that out without affecting the user experience?

Answering those questions might leave you with a skeptical perspective tackling the increasing complexity.

But it’s clear that even with these practices, you still to formalize this discipline and get some automation around it, because guess what? It’s not always clear when are you adding new complexity, since this is more of a subtle, evolving and sometimes invisible product development behavior.

Continuous Delivery

As per continuousdelivery.com definition, CD is: “The ability to get changes of all types—including new features, configuration changes, bug fixes and experiments—into production, or into the hands of users, safely and quickly in a sustainable way.”

CD was adapted by many ventures as one of the pillars for software product agility. Many people break down CD into 2 major categories:
  • Continuous Integration
  • Continuous Deployment

And the outcome of those 2 practices is called Continuous Delivery. A practice that you adapt to shorten the product update cycle. But is it true that it’s only about coding practices?

To my point of view, CD is an overarching practice, that not only affects the code base, but also affects several aspects like: Architecture, Usability, and Product-market fit. I’m going to try to highlight the last aspect a little bit more.

Enhance your product-market fit with CD



When thinking about product-market fit as a phase many products should go through, you can notice 1 thing. It’s all about uncertainty! You’re trying to measure different view for your product, study reactions, and learn from that!

Then, if you’re validating a concept, trying to get a buy-in for a specific feature, you’re actually engaged in a software development process. Having the CD practice in your mind can help you elaborate more bit-sized tests for this new concept. Instead of start working on that big, exciting feature, think about how can we change an existing view to look like the new feature? How can we separate that new view from the old view and test that out?

So you have CD in your arsenal to validate your product hypothesis, you can easily move between concepts and worry less about complexity. That helps you on the architectural side to safely land an incremental design process, in which you manage design complexity on-the-go.


CD is a great way to slowly add complexity to your product while be safe not to create negative complexity or hidden ones.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ما وراء المنطق، بين المثالي والواقعي: أين تُرسم الحدود؟

 يبدأ التساؤل من مُشاهدات يومية اعتادتها أعين من عايش التناقضات: ماهي طبيعة تلك الحياة؟ ما السر وراء انقضاء الأحداث بهذا الشكل؟ هل تسير الأحداث وفق خطة منضبطة؟ أم أنها لا تنفك تحدث حتى تُحِدث هي الأخرى المزيد من الأحداث؟  اعتاد نور رؤية تلك التناقضات يوماً بعد يوم، فقد أخذ ذهنه يتشرّب ويفسّر أحداث عالمه من خلال منظارين مختلفين لكل منهما معيار خاص في رؤية الأحداث. أحد المنظارين اعتاد تفسير الأحداث انطلاقاً من فرضية أن هناك خطة موضوعة بدقة وعناية لضبط الأحداث.  والآخر اعتاد تفسيرها على أنها نتيجة لبعضها البعض، فعندما يتعرض المرء لحادثة سير، لا يوجد خطة لذلك، تكون العوامل هي مسببات تلك النتيجة: كأن يكون المرء شارد الذهن بسبب خلاف شخصي، وأن يكون السائق مشغول بتفقد مؤشر الوقود، وأن تكون حرارة الجو قد تسببت في بطء حركة المكابح، فكل هذه العوامل مجتمعة أدت إلى حادث السير، وليست الخطة الأوليّة.  لم يكن يعي نور ماهية المنظارين بعد، بل لم يكن يعي ما يعنيه أن يكون للمرء معيار في المقام الأول! لكنه بدأ يلحظ مشاهد حياتية تلفت انتباهه إلى الفرق بينهما. كان نور وأبناء جيله معتادين ع...

سبر أغوار العقل البشري - نظرية العقل كصفحة الفارغة لچون لوك

نستكمل اليوم رحلة فلسفية أخرى والتي هي بمثابة مغامرة جريئة! منذ فترة قريبة، كنا نستكشف فكرة المعرفة الفطرية، التي أذهلت الفلاسفة العباقرة ذوي الأفكار الثورية. سابقًا، تعرضنا بشيء من التفصيل المبسّط لمفكرين عظماء مثل إيمانويل كانط . وهو من شاكلة المفكرين المثاليين الذين اعتقدوا أنّ عقولنا تأتي إلى العالم مزوّدة بمبادئ أولى عن المفاهيم التي نعاصرها في عالمنا.، والتي تُدعى بالمعرفة الفطرية. ( رابط الفيديو الذي يتحدث عن نظرة إيمانويل كانط للمعرفة الفطرية ) . الآن سنغير المسار قليلًا. وسنتجه إلى الفريق المقابل للفلاسفة المثاليين، وعلى رأس هذا الفريق هناك "چ ون لوك " وهو مرشدنا في مهمة اليوم الجريئة. إنه بمثابة المحقق الجاد في عالم الأفكار. لوك ، الفيلسوف والطبيب الشهير، يتحدى فكرة المعرفة الفطرية، ويقول أن عقولنا تكون عبارة عن ألواح فارغة عندما نولد، دون أي معرفة فطرية. في هذه المقالة، سوف ننظر عن كثب إلى فكرة المعرفة الفطرية ولكن من زاوية مختلفة، التي يمكننا أن نسميها بزاوية الفلسفة " الماديّة ". يقول لوك إننا لا ندخل إلى العالم بأفكار مُدمجة بشكل فطري، بل نتعلم الأشيا...

So what's Agile UX, Design Thinking, and the all other lean stuff?

Agile & Lean Startup: What was the problem with Agile? Agile was a reaction to the fact that we couldn’t produce software effectively and efficiently. The industry had some hard time addressing the problems with what we called “The waterfall process”. The problem was clearly that the process of building and producing software was difficult and tedious, and moreover, not successful. And how did we addressed it mainly in Agile? It was simple approach: Work iteratively. Shorten the feedback cycle. Evaluate and repeat.  And it was a success! Thanks to Agile, the software delivery process has been enhanced, more projects were able to deliver software to market successfully and in more disciplined way. So? We discovered later that even with successful delivery, more and more software aren’t being used as imagined. We produced and delivered a lot of software, but the users never used it as imagined -or never used it at all. That was a clear indication for people in...