Skip to main content

Test-driven product development: concepts and approach

Building digital products is a very challenging practice, since it's built on circles of thoughts among: managers, marketers, and engineers. It becomes even more challenging when we need to validate and test our ideas and concepts through out the whole development cycle.

Testing and validation isn't necessarily restricted to the technical testing (i.e. writing test cases and run them against the product functionalities), it can be also extended to the scope of validating and testing the ideas even earlier in the cycle. Before any development has taken place.

In this article I'm trying to explain more how can we pave the product environment to be more testing-friendly environment across the different stages of product development.

What’s the point of measuring stuff we build? 

Nuclear Weapons Test, Nuclear Weapon, Weapons Test

As humans, we tend to measure things around us in order to understand them better. For example: You're always measuring how fast you can get to work on foot vs. by train so that you can understand how to use your time more effectively. Our brains usually tend to measure stuff and record those measurements for the next time. Guess what? Building a digital product is absolutely no different!

While building digital product, you need to be equipped and ready to measure everything, so that you can do 2 things:

Understanding your product audience, and learning from that to make it better.


You cannot control what you cannot measure.

When dealing with digital products, complexity grows over time. And the more complexity you have, the harder it will take you to control it. So, you have to be prepared! 

Taking testing seriously from day 0 in your product environment is a win-win situation. It will help you drive your product to a valuable outcome, as you'll always be challenging the hypotheses you form with tests.

When you develop this sense of testing, you'll start to take control on the product outcomes, and you'll be able to measure different aspects of the product lifecycle, things like:

  • You're going to identify which product hypotheses are more realistic (i.e. address actual problems that your target customers facing) than the others, and that's how you're going to provide more valuable outcomes.
  • You're going to identify which solution can be best fit for your product hypotheses, and you're going to test that in different ways that will save you pushing invalidated concepts to your engineers. 
  • You're going to test the robustness and the easiness of your product quite often and quite early, that's how you're going to drive more usable product.
If you can measure your each phase in your product lifecycle you'll find it more controllable and you'd be more confident when things become more complex.

When to test? And how these tests should look like?

Image result for learn build measure"

In his popular book "The Lean Startup", Eric Ries stated 3 main steps that form the heart of lean startups: Learn, Build, and then Measure.

In the same fashion, while building your product, and while thinking about the different stages (i.e. user discovery, solution hypotheses, product engineering, scaling, etc.) you should keep the same structure in mind.

Start with a minimal version that address something you know about your users, and measure that version with a specified metrics.
That way, you should be always testing when you have something that real product customers can deal with (not necessaries a fully-developed version). And you will form your tests in something like:

If I did [something], for [a specified product persona/segment].
They will respond by [some output you expect],
And we can measure that by [some metric you think will be affected].

Having this approach in your mind, your way of thinking about the product will become more test-driven. And you'll be able to expect the outcome and to behave accordingly in case you found things going the wrong direction.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

سبر أغوار العقل البشري - نظرية العقل كصفحة الفارغة لچون لوك

نستكمل اليوم رحلة فلسفية أخرى والتي هي بمثابة مغامرة جريئة! منذ فترة قريبة، كنا نستكشف فكرة المعرفة الفطرية، التي أذهلت الفلاسفة العباقرة ذوي الأفكار الثورية. سابقًا، تعرضنا بشيء من التفصيل المبسّط لمفكرين عظماء مثل إيمانويل كانط . وهو من شاكلة المفكرين المثاليين الذين اعتقدوا أنّ عقولنا تأتي إلى العالم مزوّدة بمبادئ أولى عن المفاهيم التي نعاصرها في عالمنا.، والتي تُدعى بالمعرفة الفطرية. ( رابط الفيديو الذي يتحدث عن نظرة إيمانويل كانط للمعرفة الفطرية ) . الآن سنغير المسار قليلًا. وسنتجه إلى الفريق المقابل للفلاسفة المثاليين، وعلى رأس هذا الفريق هناك "چ ون لوك " وهو مرشدنا في مهمة اليوم الجريئة. إنه بمثابة المحقق الجاد في عالم الأفكار. لوك ، الفيلسوف والطبيب الشهير، يتحدى فكرة المعرفة الفطرية، ويقول أن عقولنا تكون عبارة عن ألواح فارغة عندما نولد، دون أي معرفة فطرية. في هذه المقالة، سوف ننظر عن كثب إلى فكرة المعرفة الفطرية ولكن من زاوية مختلفة، التي يمكننا أن نسميها بزاوية الفلسفة " الماديّة ". يقول لوك إننا لا ندخل إلى العالم بأفكار مُدمجة بشكل فطري، بل نتعلم الأشيا...

ما وراء المنطق، بين المثالي والواقعي: أين تُرسم الحدود؟

 يبدأ التساؤل من مُشاهدات يومية اعتادتها أعين من عايش التناقضات: ماهي طبيعة تلك الحياة؟ ما السر وراء انقضاء الأحداث بهذا الشكل؟ هل تسير الأحداث وفق خطة منضبطة؟ أم أنها لا تنفك تحدث حتى تُحِدث هي الأخرى المزيد من الأحداث؟  اعتاد نور رؤية تلك التناقضات يوماً بعد يوم، فقد أخذ ذهنه يتشرّب ويفسّر أحداث عالمه من خلال منظارين مختلفين لكل منهما معيار خاص في رؤية الأحداث. أحد المنظارين اعتاد تفسير الأحداث انطلاقاً من فرضية أن هناك خطة موضوعة بدقة وعناية لضبط الأحداث.  والآخر اعتاد تفسيرها على أنها نتيجة لبعضها البعض، فعندما يتعرض المرء لحادثة سير، لا يوجد خطة لذلك، تكون العوامل هي مسببات تلك النتيجة: كأن يكون المرء شارد الذهن بسبب خلاف شخصي، وأن يكون السائق مشغول بتفقد مؤشر الوقود، وأن تكون حرارة الجو قد تسببت في بطء حركة المكابح، فكل هذه العوامل مجتمعة أدت إلى حادث السير، وليست الخطة الأوليّة.  لم يكن يعي نور ماهية المنظارين بعد، بل لم يكن يعي ما يعنيه أن يكون للمرء معيار في المقام الأول! لكنه بدأ يلحظ مشاهد حياتية تلفت انتباهه إلى الفرق بينهما. كان نور وأبناء جيله معتادين ع...

Unlocking the Mind's Mysteries: The mind as a blank page (Tabula Rasa Theory)

Picture this: our philosophical journey is like a grand adventure. We've been exploring the idea of innate knowledge, something that has fascinated intelligent folks who think about big ideas. Before, we soared through the clouds of fancy thoughts with thinkers like Immanuel Kant . They believed that our minds held secret wisdom from the start. But now, we're changing course. Imagine John Locke as our guide on a daring quest. He's like a detective in the world of ideas. Locke, a famous philosopher, challenges the notion of innate knowledge. He says our minds are blank slates when we're born, with no secret knowledge. In this article, we're getting focused. We will look closely at the idea of innate knowledge but from a different angle - what we call "materialism." Locke says we don't pop into the world with built-in ideas. Instead, we learn stuff through our senses and by watching and experimenting. Join us for an exciting journey as we compare these ...